This is a very big decision, but it all hinges on a technicality--the
definition of the class--rather than the substance. The interesting
thing now is what the three parties do next:
1. MPS: what it keeps
and what it doesn't from the plan if it is not under the court order. My
impression is that there is a lot of good in that plan, particularly in
identifying students that need extra assistance in reading and math,
and having differentiated instruction. If done well that should help all
students.
2. DPI: what does it do now that its settlement has been thrown out?
3.
Plaintiffs: can they redefine the class more narrowly as suggested in
the dissent? At this late date, does that make any sense?
Saturday, February 04, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)